Logical Fallacy Pins and Buttons

Description: The Scapegoating fallacy occurs when someone unfairly blames a problem on an already unpopular person or group.

Description: The Holmesian Fallacy occurs when someone assumes they have eliminated all incorrect answers and arrive at their conclusion because it is the only remaining answer they can think of.

Description: The I'm Entitled to my Opinion Fallacy occurs when someone invokes this supposed right in the face of opposing evidence which they can't argue against. Subscribe to the podcast at http://fallacioustrump.com

Description: Inspired by the single cause fallacy

Description: The Fallacy Fallacy occurs when you assume a claim is false because a logical fallacy was used during arguments supporting the claim.

Description: The Didactic Fallacy occurs when someone attempts to apply a historical analogy to a current situation but takes the wrong lesson from history or applies it to an inappropriate modern problem.

Description: Whataboutism occurs when someone who is accused of something tries to distract and derail the conversation by talking about something somebody else did, which is implied to be equivalent.

Description: A clean, typography-focused design for software developers, coders, and computer science nerds who appreciate clean code and dark humor.

Description: A straw man fallacy is the logical error of distorting a claim or argument to make it easier to refute. Help to spread the word about this logical fallacy

Description: A definition of a logical fallacy, as described by the Fallacious Trump Podcast

Description: False Uniqueness occurs when someone overestimates how rare their positive traits, abilities, or experience are.

Description: Ampersand design logical fallacies shirt, featuring Strawman, Post Hoc, Ad Hominem and Non Sequitur

Description: The Courtier's Reply occurs when someone dismisses their opponent's opinion by claiming they lack sufficient expertise on the subject to be allowed to opine.

Description: The Appeal to Pity Fallacy occurs when someone tries to convince others by making them feel sympathetic instead of using evidence.

Description: The Blinded by AI Fallacy occurs when someone bases their claim on an unrealistic view of what artificial intelligence is currently capable of reliably achieving.

Description: The Slippery Slope fallacy is committed when a person assumes if one bad thing happens, then more, and often worse, bad things will inevitably follow.

Description: Make a bold, logical statement with this "CORRELATION $\neq$ CAUSATION" design. Featuring a rugged, distressed white block typography layout centered around a classic mathematical symbol, this high-contrast graphic pops perfectly against dark backgrounds. It captures the essential rule of statistics and logic with a raw, industrial aesthetic. An outstanding print option for comfortable everyday t-shirts, cozy late-night hoodies, heavy canvas tote bags, and bold laptop stickers. This makes a phenomenal gift for data scientists, math teachers, researchers, or anyone who spends their day running complex technical analysis and looking at charts.

Description: i could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Description: i could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Description: A logical fallacy in which the arguer ignores a large amount of evidence which casts doubt on their claim, carefully selecting only the parts which make their claim sound plausible.

Description: A Red Herring is a distraction, anything that sends a conversation off on a tangent and away from the original point. When someone completely avoids a question by bringing up another issue entirely, they are committing a Red Herring fallacy.

Description: The Sour Grapes Fallacy occurs when someone rationalizes their failure after the fact by claiming the thing they were trying to attain wasn't actually any good.

Description: The No True Scotsman Fallacy is committed when your existing definition of a particular group is challenged by a member who doesn’t fit the criteria. Rather than adjust the definition, the offending group member is redefined as a non-member of the group.

Description: The Iron Man fallacy is committed when someone misrepresents their own position (or one they agree with) to suggest it is in fact a much stronger position that nobody could argue with.

Description: Kindly remind people when they're making logical fallacies like argumentum ad hominem.

Description: Make a bold, logical statement with this "CORRELATION $\neq$ CAUSATION" black text design. Featuring a rugged, distressed white block typography layout centered around a classic mathematical symbol, this high-contrast graphic pops perfectly against dark backgrounds. It captures the essential rule of statistics and logic with a raw, industrial aesthetic. An outstanding print option for comfortable everyday t-shirts, cozy late-night hoodies, heavy canvas tote bags, and bold laptop stickers. This makes a phenomenal gift for data scientists, math teachers, researchers, or anyone who spends their day running complex technical analysis and looking at charts.

Description: Salvation at the Cross is beyond logic. Jesus said something like this in the Gospel of John, " no one can come to me unless the Father draws him."

Description: Correlation vs. Causation tee. Illustrates a crucial concept for critical thinking. A visual reminder for reasoned perspectives. Philosophy for the thoughtful mind.

Description: The Playing the Victim fallacy occurs when someone tries to deflect criticism by arguing the target of criticism is just being persecuted, without addressing the content of the accusation. By attributing negative traits to someone before they even have the chance to make their argument, the well poisoner primes the listener not to believe what they are about to hear. As it does not seek to address the actual argument at all, this reasoning is fallacious.

Description: This is more accurately called the Argument from Improper or False Authority. After all, it’s entirely valid to support your argument by invoking a relevant authority like, say, climate scientists opinions on climate change. However, when the authority you invoke is not an authority on the subject at hand, or objectively not reliable or trustworthy, you are committing a fallacy.

Description: Correlation Is Not Causation. A visual reminder that links don't always mean causes. Perfect for critical thinkers and logic lovers. A thoughtful statement piece.

Description: Occam's olde-timey, pure logic razors.

Description: The pyramid of debate, a concept proposed by Paul Graham on 'how to disagree'.

Description: You know for a fact that you are factually right and accurate. But there are people who can't change despite providing enough facts and valid logical arguments. You can't force them to be right. You can only agree to disagree and move and dont have to end up having a quarrel.

Description: Appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect

Description: Correlation does not imply causation