Fallacy Fallacy Posters and Art Prints

Description: The Scapegoating fallacy occurs when someone unfairly blames a problem on an already unpopular person or group.

Description: The Fallacy Fallacy occurs when you assume a claim is false because a logical fallacy was used during arguments supporting the claim.

Description: The Exact Definition Fallacy occurs when someone disingenuously demands their opponent provide a definition solely to score debate points when they can't provide one that meets an arbitrary standard

Description: The Appeal to Definition Fallacy occurs when someone relies on a specific definition, from a dictionary or other authority, which supports their argument, and ignores the possibility that other definitions are also reasonable.

Description: A straw man fallacy is the logical error of distorting a claim or argument to make it easier to refute. Help to spread the word about this logical fallacy

Description: Sunk cost fallacy. The “sunk cost fallacy” is where sunk costs made in the past influence future investment. Whilst it may make sense to discontinue investment and “cut ones losses” often the fact of the past costs are used to justify continuing. This could be true of for example economic investments or relationships. Throwing good money after bad.

Description: The Appeal to Pity Fallacy occurs when someone tries to convince others by making them feel sympathetic instead of using evidence.

Description: The Courtier's Reply occurs when someone dismisses their opponent's opinion by claiming they lack sufficient expertise on the subject to be allowed to opine.

Description: The Didactic Fallacy occurs when someone attempts to apply a historical analogy to a current situation but takes the wrong lesson from history or applies it to an inappropriate modern problem.

Description: False Uniqueness occurs when someone overestimates how rare their positive traits, abilities, or experience are.

Description: The Blinded by AI Fallacy occurs when someone bases their claim on an unrealistic view of what artificial intelligence is currently capable of reliably achieving.

Description: Whataboutism occurs when someone who is accused of something tries to distract and derail the conversation by talking about something somebody else did, which is implied to be equivalent.

Description: The Iron Man fallacy is committed when someone misrepresents their own position (or one they agree with) to suggest it is in fact a much stronger position that nobody could argue with.

Description: The I'm Entitled to my Opinion Fallacy occurs when someone invokes this supposed right in the face of opposing evidence which they can't argue against. Subscribe to the podcast at http://fallacioustrump.com

Description: The Sour Grapes Fallacy occurs when someone rationalizes their failure after the fact by claiming the thing they were trying to attain wasn't actually any good.

Description: The Holmesian Fallacy occurs when someone assumes they have eliminated all incorrect answers and arrive at their conclusion because it is the only remaining answer they can think of.

Description: A logical fallacy in which the arguer ignores a large amount of evidence which casts doubt on their claim, carefully selecting only the parts which make their claim sound plausible.

Description: This is more accurately called the Argument from Improper or False Authority. After all, it’s entirely valid to support your argument by invoking a relevant authority like, say, climate scientists opinions on climate change. However, when the authority you invoke is not an authority on the subject at hand, or objectively not reliable or trustworthy, you are committing a fallacy.

Description: The Playing the Victim fallacy occurs when someone tries to deflect criticism by arguing the target of criticism is just being persecuted, without addressing the content of the accusation. By attributing negative traits to someone before they even have the chance to make their argument, the well poisoner primes the listener not to believe what they are about to hear. As it does not seek to address the actual argument at all, this reasoning is fallacious.

Description: The Slippery Slope fallacy is committed when a person assumes if one bad thing happens, then more, and often worse, bad things will inevitably follow.

Description: The No True Scotsman Fallacy is committed when your existing definition of a particular group is challenged by a member who doesn’t fit the criteria. Rather than adjust the definition, the offending group member is redefined as a non-member of the group.

Description: A Red Herring is a distraction, anything that sends a conversation off on a tangent and away from the original point. When someone completely avoids a question by bringing up another issue entirely, they are committing a Red Herring fallacy.

Description: A definition of a logical fallacy, as described by the Fallacious Trump Podcast

Description: Fallacy Of Ruin Atrocity Solution

Description: Correlation vs. Causation: A tee for critical thinking! Embrace logic & scientific mindset. Great gift for those seeking truth.

Description: correlation = causation

Description: The Definist Fallacy occurs when someone deliberately redefines a term in a way that's favorable to their own argument (and is probably a stretch of the real definition)

Description: Correlation/causation mix-up? This tee playfully nods to the subtle but crucial difference, especially relevant in psychology and therapy. A thought-provoking conversation starter.

Description: Correlation Isn't Causation Psychotherapy Tee A thought-provoking tee highlighting the difference between correlation and causation. Great for therapists, students, or anyone who enjoys pondering logical fallacies.

Description: Correlation vs. Causation tee. Illustrates a crucial concept for critical thinking. A visual reminder for reasoned perspectives. Philosophy for the thoughtful mind.

Description: **Correlation Is Not Causation Psychotherapy Tee** A thought-provoking design for therapists and mental health advocates. It sparks conversations on critical thinking within well-being practices.

Description: Make a bold, logical statement with this "CORRELATION $\neq$ CAUSATION" design. Featuring a rugged, distressed white block typography layout centered around a classic mathematical symbol, this high-contrast graphic pops perfectly against dark backgrounds. It captures the essential rule of statistics and logic with a raw, industrial aesthetic. An outstanding print option for comfortable everyday t-shirts, cozy late-night hoodies, heavy canvas tote bags, and bold laptop stickers. This makes a phenomenal gift for data scientists, math teachers, researchers, or anyone who spends their day running complex technical analysis and looking at charts.

Description: Make a bold, logical statement with this "CORRELATION $\neq$ CAUSATION" black text design. Featuring a rugged, distressed white block typography layout centered around a classic mathematical symbol, this high-contrast graphic pops perfectly against dark backgrounds. It captures the essential rule of statistics and logic with a raw, industrial aesthetic. An outstanding print option for comfortable everyday t-shirts, cozy late-night hoodies, heavy canvas tote bags, and bold laptop stickers. This makes a phenomenal gift for data scientists, math teachers, researchers, or anyone who spends their day running complex technical analysis and looking at charts.

Description: i could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Description: i could agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

Description: A humorous design for mathematicians, physics students, and STEM nerds who understand the power of a confusingly confident proof.